Nvidia Geforce Mx350 Vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics

Nvidia Geforce Mx350 Vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics. A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: Able to handle most of the light games and mobile games using android emulator such as bluestacks.

Hardware und NachrichtenLinks des 1. November 2020 from www.3dcenter.org

Intel tiger lake xe gpu vs nvidia pascal geforce mx350 graphics performance: Fire strike is a directx 11 benchmark for gaming pcs. Around 69% higher texture fill rate:

79.20 Gtexel/S Vs 46.98 Gtexel/S.

On the contrary, the geforce mx350 delivered up to 16.4% higher performance than intel's offering. Based on 46,259 user benchmarks for the intel iris plus g7 and the nvidia geforce mx350, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 681 gpus. Around 12% higher boost clock speed:

Around 69% Higher Texture Fill Rate:

We compared the characteristics of nvidia geforce mx450 and intel iris xe max graphics and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table. Based on 109,585 user benchmarks for the intel iris xe and the nvidia geforce mx350, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 681 gpus. Around 87% higher texture fill rate:

15 Watt Vs 20 Watt.

2020 intel iris plus igpu. 10 nm vs 14 nm. Tiger lake cpu (g7 series) will have 96 and 80 xe.

Launch Date 8 Month (S) Later.

A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 88.00 gtexel/s vs 46.98 gtexel/s. Around 33% lower typical power consumption:

Graphics Card Rankings (Price Vs.

On the contrary, the geforce mx350 delivered up to 16.4% higher performance than intel's offering. Although at the end of the day, it’s probably not worth spending extra money for. 10 nm vs 14 nm.

Share This Post